Atıf Formatları
Comparison of the sensitivity for detecting foreign bodies among conventional plain radiography, computed tomography and ultrasonography
  • IEEE
  • ACM
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • MLA
  • Harvard
  • BibTeX

M. H. Aras Et Al. , "Comparison of the sensitivity for detecting foreign bodies among conventional plain radiography, computed tomography and ultrasonography," DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY , vol.39, no.2, pp.72-78, 2010

Aras, M. H. Et Al. 2010. Comparison of the sensitivity for detecting foreign bodies among conventional plain radiography, computed tomography and ultrasonography. DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY , vol.39, no.2 , 72-78.

Aras, M. H., MİLOĞLU, Ö., BARUTCUGIL, C., Kantarci, M., OZCAN, E., & HARORLI, A., (2010). Comparison of the sensitivity for detecting foreign bodies among conventional plain radiography, computed tomography and ultrasonography. DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY , vol.39, no.2, 72-78.

Aras, M. Et Al. "Comparison of the sensitivity for detecting foreign bodies among conventional plain radiography, computed tomography and ultrasonography," DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY , vol.39, no.2, 72-78, 2010

Aras, M. H. Et Al. "Comparison of the sensitivity for detecting foreign bodies among conventional plain radiography, computed tomography and ultrasonography." DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY , vol.39, no.2, pp.72-78, 2010

Aras, M. H. Et Al. (2010) . "Comparison of the sensitivity for detecting foreign bodies among conventional plain radiography, computed tomography and ultrasonography." DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY , vol.39, no.2, pp.72-78.

@article{article, author={M. H. Aras Et Al. }, title={Comparison of the sensitivity for detecting foreign bodies among conventional plain radiography, computed tomography and ultrasonography}, journal={DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY}, year=2010, pages={72-78} }