27. ulusal çocuk ve ergen ruh sağlığı ve hastalıkları kongresi, İzmir, Türkiye, 10 - 13 Mayıs 2017, ss.328-329
A Record in Justice System of Turkey: 45 Days, 5 Crimes, 4 Different Forensic
Interviewer
İbrahim Selçuk Esin 1
,Mustafa Talip Şener 2
,Esen Yıldırım Demirdöğen 1
,Onur Burak Dursun
1
,
1 Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Ataturk University,
Erzurum/Turkey
2 Department of Forensic Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ataturk University,
Erzurum/Turkey
Introduction: In criminal responsibility assessments, criminal responsibility is separately
evaluated for each offense, even if more than one offense is committed in a consecutive periods.
We aimed at sharing the drawbacks of the forensic evaluation of a child who committed
repetitive crimes and each time referred to different centers for forensic psychiatric evaluation. Case: Our case is a 13 years old boy. Within a 45 days period, he is accused of committing 5
crimes namely theft and damage to property. He was referred to different centers for each crime
for criminal responsibility assessment. Therefore Different decisions were made and
discordant judicial reports were prepared for similar crimes. As a result of this discrepancy,
judicial units needed new evaluations for each crime.
Discussion: Precaution reports should be prepared about the children who are committed
recurrent crimes. In order to be prepared the precaution report, evaluators should have been
informed about all judicial elements. Thus, as well as discrepancies are removed accurate
evaluations can be possible.