Akademik Veri Yönetim Sistemi
UROLOGY, cilt.190, ss.36-43, 2024 (SCI-Expanded)
OBJECTIVE To contribute to the literature by sharing the clinical presentation, surgical approach, postoperative complications management, and follow-up protocols of the patients we operated on due to intrascrotal extratesticular mass. METHODS Thirty-two patients admitted due to intrascrotal extratesticular mass were included in the study. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients such as age, initial clinical presentation, physical examination, radiological imaging findings, such as scrotal Doppler ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging, mass size, and characteristics, surgical treatment procedures, operation notes, and patient follow-up visits were retrospectively examined and evaluated from the patient files. RESULTS The median age of the 32 individuals included in the study was 52 (interquartile range: [45.060.5]) years. The primary reason for initial presentation was a palpable mass in 25 (78.1%) patients, pain in 13 (40.6%) patients, and scrotal swelling in 8 (25%) patients. The median mass diameter was 4.4 (interquartile range: [3.1-5.7]) cm. Surgical treatment involved inguinal excision in 29 cases (90.6%) and inguinoscrotal excision in 3 cases (9.4%). All patients were treated with testicle-sparing surgery. The most common tumor location, observed in 27 cases (84.3%), was the epididymis. The most frequent histopathological diagnosis was epididymal cyst, identified in 13 patients (40.6%). Pathology results showed that the mass was removed with negative margins in all patients. CONCLUSION Testicular-sparing surgery through the inguinal approach is one of the surgical methods that can be preferred for intrascrotal extratesticular masses. This approach can both preserve the testicle and achieve successful surgical results. Studies with larger samples are needed on this subject.