Healthcare 5.0-Driven Clinical Intelligence: The Learn-Predict-Monitor-Detect-Correct Framework for Systematic Artificial Intelligence Integration in Critical Care


Boussi Rahmouni H., Hassine N. B. E. H., Chouchen M., CEYLAN H. İ., Muntean R. I., Bragazzi N. L., ...Daha Fazla

Healthcare (Switzerland), cilt.13, sa.20, 2025 (SCI-Expanded, SSCI, Scopus) identifier identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Derleme
  • Cilt numarası: 13 Sayı: 20
  • Basım Tarihi: 2025
  • Doi Numarası: 10.3390/healthcare13202553
  • Dergi Adı: Healthcare (Switzerland)
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI), Scopus, CINAHL
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: clinical decision support, digital twins, human–computer interaction, internet of medical things, machine learning, patient safety, predictive analytics, sepsis prediction
  • Atatürk Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Background: Healthcare 5.0 represents a shift toward intelligent, human-centric care systems. Intensive care units generate vast amounts of data that require real-time decisions, but current decision support systems lack comprehensive frameworks for safe integration of artificial intelligence. Objective: We developed and validated the Learn–Predict–Monitor–Detect–Correct (LPMDC) framework as a methodology for systematic artificial intelligence integration across the critical care workflow. The framework improves predictive analytics, continuous patient monitoring, intelligent alerting, and therapeutic decision support while maintaining essential human clinical oversight. Methods: Framework development employed systematic theoretical modeling integrating Healthcare 5.0 principles, comprehensive literature synthesis covering 2020–2024, clinical workflow analysis across 15 international ICU sites, technology assessment of mature and emerging AI applications, and multi-round expert validation by 24 intensive care physicians and medical informaticists. Each LPMDC phase was designed with specific integration requirements, performance metrics, and safety protocols. Results: LPMDC implementation and aggregated evidence from prior studies demonstrated significant clinical improvements: 30% mortality reduction, 18% ICU length-of-stay decrease (7.5 to 6.1 days), 45% clinician cognitive load reduction, and 85% sepsis bundle compliance improvement. Machine learning algorithms achieved an 80% sensitivity for sepsis prediction three hours before clinical onset, with false-positive rates below 15%. Additional applications demonstrated effectiveness in predicting respiratory failure, preventing cardiovascular crises, and automating ventilator management. Digital twins technology enabled personalized treatment simulations, while the integration of the Internet of Medical Things provided comprehensive patient and environmental surveillance. Implementation challenges were systematically addressed through phased deployment strategies, staff training programs, and regulatory compliance frameworks. Conclusions: The Healthcare 5.0-enabled LPMDC framework provides the first comprehensive theoretical foundation for systematic AI integration in critical care while preserving human oversight and clinical safety. The cyclical five-phase architecture enables processing beyond traditional cognitive limits through continuous feedback loops and system optimization. Clinical validation demonstrates measurable improvements in patient outcomes, operational efficiency, and clinician satisfaction. Future developments incorporating quantum computing, federated learning, and explainable AI technologies offer additional advancement opportunities for next-generation critical care systems.