Comparison of theoretical frameworks of doctoral theses on the field of instructional technology: The Turkey-US case

Simsek E. S., Atila G., Aydın A., Reisoglu I., Göktaş Y.

LIBRARY & INFORMATION SCIENCE RESEARCH, cilt.44, sa.1, 2022 (SSCI) identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 44 Sayı: 1
  • Basım Tarihi: 2022
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1016/j.lisr.2022.101138
  • Dergi Adı: LIBRARY & INFORMATION SCIENCE RESEARCH
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI), Scopus, Academic Search Premier, FRANCIS, EBSCO Education Source, Education Abstracts, Information Science and Technology Abstracts, INSPEC, Library and Information Science Abstracts, Library Literature and Information Science, Library, Information Science & Technology Abstracts (LISTA), MLA - Modern Language Association Database, DIALNET
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: Instructional technology, Academic writing, Theoretical framework, Turkey-US comparison
  • Atatürk Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Although there are suggestions for writing the theoretical framework in the literature, studies on how all sections of research should be structured based on the theoretical framework are limited. The current research compared the structuring of doctoral theses' theoretical frameworks in the field of instructional technology produced in Turkey and the US. Two hundred doctoral theses were subjected to content analysis based on the list of criteria developed by the researchers. The data collection tool includes the criteria of formality, language, definition and association, purpose and significance, methodological procedures, and presentation and interpretation of results. Independent factorial ANOVA were used to determine whether country and method affected the data obtained from the analyzed theses. The analysis of the data showed that the US-based theses were structured in accordance with the established criteria in all aspects except for purpose and importance. Method did not affect consistency with the criteria. The results of the study are anticipated to guide graduate students, thesis advisors, and researchers preparing theses and articles.