KTP laser therapy as an adjunctive to scaling and root planing in treatment of chronic periodontitis


Creative Commons License

Dilsiz A., Sevinc S. N.

ACTA ODONTOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, cilt.72, sa.8, ss.681-686, 2014 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 72 Sayı: 8
  • Basım Tarihi: 2014
  • Doi Numarası: 10.3109/00016357.2014.898088
  • Dergi Adı: ACTA ODONTOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.681-686
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: chronic periodontitis, non-surgical periodontal debridement, laser therapy, lasers and potassium titanyl phosphate (KTP) laser, CONTROLLED CLINICAL-TRIAL, ER-YAG LASER, NDYAG LASER, ULTRASONIC SCALERS, INSTRUMENTATION, POCKETS
  • Atatürk Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Objective. The main goal of periodontal treatment is to control infection and, thereby, curb disease progression. Recent studies have suggested that the use of a laser as an adjunct to scaling and root planing (SRP) might improve the effectiveness of conventional periodontal treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the clinical effects of potassium-titanylphosphate (KTP) laser therapy in the treatment of chronic periodontitis in combination with traditional SRP. Materials and methods. Twenty-four patients with untreated chronic periodontitis were treated using a split-mouth study design in which each side was randomly treated by SRP alone (control group) or KTP laser (0.8W, time on 50 ms, time off 50 ms, 30 s, 532 nm) followed by SRP (test group). In the distribution of the teeth (total = 124 teeth) in the patients, 106 (86%) were molars and 18 (14%) were premolars. The selected teeth were probed with a pressure-controlled probe, guided by stents. Clinical periodontal parameters including plaque index (PI), bleeding on probing (BOP), probing pocket depth (PPD) and probing attachment level (PAL) were recorded at baseline and at 2 and 12 months following therapy. Results. Statistical analysis demonstrated no differences between groups at baseline for all parameters (p > 0.05). BOP and PPD reductions and PAL gains were statistically significant both between baseline and 2 months and between baseline and 12 months in both groups (p < 0.05). The test group showed a greater reduction in PPD compared to the control group (p < 0.05). In addition, the test group showed a greater probing attachment gain compared to the control group (p < 0.05). Conclusions. In patients with chronic periodontitis, clinical outcomes of conventional periodontal treatment can be improved by using an adjunctive KTP laser.