Comparison of On-Pump Beating Heart Surgery Versus Conventional Bypass Surgery in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction Requiring Urgent Revascularization


Kılıç Y., Jalalzai I., Sönmez E., Erkut B.

HEART SURGERY FORUM, vol.27, no.3, pp.271-281, 2024 (SCI-Expanded, Scopus)

  • Publication Type: Article / Article
  • Volume: 27 Issue: 3
  • Publication Date: 2024
  • Doi Number: 10.59958/hsf.7203
  • Journal Name: HEART SURGERY FORUM
  • Journal Indexes: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, EMBASE, MEDLINE
  • Page Numbers: pp.271-281
  • Ataturk University Affiliated: Yes

Abstract

Background: The objective of our study was to provide the

initial outcomes of the traditional coronary artery surgery

approach and the on-pump beating heart surgery in terms

of survival and morbidity in patients who needed emergency

surgery for acute myocardial infarction. Methods:

A single-center retrospective study was performed from

November 2013 to September 2023 on a total of 212 patients

requiring emergency coronary artery surgery. Group

I patients (n = 108) received traditional coronary artery

bypass grafting with cross-clamping, while Group II patients

(n = 104) underwent on-pump coronary surgery on

the beating heart. Results: There were no disparities observed

in the preoperative left ventricular function, percutaneous

coronary intervention, intra-aortic balloon usage, or

clinical-hemodynamic characteristics. Group I patients had

significantly higher rates of postoperative mortality and low

cardiac output syndrome, as well as a greater utilization of

intra-aortic balloons and a higher requirement for extracorporeal

membrane oxygenation (p < 0.001). Conclusions:

Ultimately, the on-pump beating heart approach could serve

as a viable alternative to enhance the preservation of cardiac

function and decrease postoperative complications and

mortality rates in patients with acute myocardial infarction

who require emergency surgery.