Improvement of water and crop productivity of silage maize by irrigation with different levels of recycled wastewater under conventional and zero tillage conditions

Yerli C., ŞAHİN Ü., ÖRS CIRIK S., KIZILOĞLU F. M.

AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, cilt.277, 2023 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 277
  • Basım Tarihi: 2023
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1016/j.agwat.2022.108100
  • Dergi Adı: AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, Academic Search Premier, PASCAL, Aerospace Database, Aqualine, Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA), BIOSIS, Biotechnology Research Abstracts, CAB Abstracts, Communication Abstracts, Compendex, Environment Index, Geobase, INSPEC, Metadex, Pollution Abstracts, Veterinary Science Database, DIALNET, Civil Engineering Abstracts
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: Deficit irrigation, Direct sowing, Forage yield, Treated wastewater, Water use efficiency, USE EFFICIENCY, ZEA-MAYS, DEFICIT IRRIGATION, DRIP IRRIGATION, GRAIN-YIELD, HEAVY-METAL, NO-TILLAGE, SOIL-MOISTURE, QUALITY, CORN
  • Atatürk Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Although wastewater irrigation has a long history involving different stages of development, the future expec-tation to improve crop yield and water productivity in wastewater irrigation practices is still relevant. Therefore, the aim of this study is to evaluate water productivity, yield and crop quality of silage maize irrigated with different application levels (100%, 67%, and 33% of irrigation need) of recycled wastewater with three replicates in conventional tillage and zero tillage practices and comparing them with full fresh water irrigation. The results of two-year field studies showed that zero tillage resulted in saving 10.1% of irrigation water on average compared to conventional tillage and actual evapotranspiration in silage maize with zero tillage was 7.4% less. Biomass yield was the highest in full irrigation with wastewater under zero tillage. Zero tillage practice provided 12.0% and 13.2% higher water productivity(WP) and irrigation water productivity(WPirrig), respectively compared to conventional tillage. The WP was higher in treatments with wastewater with 100% and 67% irri-gation levels, while the WPirrig was higher in treatment with wastewater with 67% irrigation level. While the crop total soluble solids, nutrients, crude protein, chlorophyll(SPAD), leaf area index and leaf relative water content (LRWC) values were higher in full irrigation with wastewater, acid and neutral detergent fibers and membrane damage was lower. Crude protein in zero tillage was lower than in conventional tillage, while SPAD and LRWC were higher. It could be concluded that wastewater can increase silage maize biomass yield and crop quality. This result may be more valuable in terms of both protecting scarce fresh water resources and contributing to the environment with waste disposal. Moreover, 67% irrigation treatment with wastewater can be preferred for the higher WP and WPirrig values, and zero tillage can be used as a practical treatment that contributes to the yield and water saving.