Incidence of Dentinal Cracks after Root Canal Preparation with Twisted File Adaptive Instruments Using Different Kinematics.


KARATAŞ E., Arslan H., ALSANCAK M., KIRICI D. O., ERSOY I.

Journal of endodontics, cilt.41, sa.7, ss.1130-3, 2015 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 41 Sayı: 7
  • Basım Tarihi: 2015
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1016/j.joen.2015.02.029
  • Dergi Adı: Journal of endodontics
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.1130-3
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: Cracks, kinematics, root canal instrumentation, Twisted File Adaptive system, SELF-ADJUSTING FILE, PROTAPER UNIVERSAL, SINGLE-FILE, ROTARY INSTRUMENTATION, EX-VIVO, REMOVAL, SYSTEMS, FRACTURE, DEFECTS, DAMAGE
  • Atatürk Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Introduction: The purpose of the present study was to assess the effect of root canal instrumentation using Twisted File Adaptive instruments (Axis/SybronEndo, Orange, CA) with different kinematics (adaptive motion, 90 degrees clockwise [CW]-30 degrees counterclockwise [CCW], 150 degrees CW-30 degrees CCW, 210 degrees CW-30 degrees CCW, and continuous rotation) on crack formation. Methods: One hundred five mandibular central incisor teeth were selected. Fifteen teeth were left unprepared (control group), and the remaining 90 teeth were assigned to the 5 root canal shaping groups as follows (n = 15): adaptive motion, 90 degrees CW-30 degrees CCW, 150 degrees CW-30 degrees CCW, 210 degrees CW-30 degrees CCW, continuous rotation, and hand file. All the roots were sectioned horizontally at 3, 6, and 9 mm from the apex with a low-speed saw under water cooling, and the slices were then viewed through a stereomicroscope at 25x magnification. Digital images of each slice were captured using a camera to determine the presence of dentinal cracks. Results: No cracks were observed in the control group, and the continuous rotation group had more cracks than the reciprocation groups (90 degrees CW-30 degrees CCW, 150 degrees CW-30 degrees CCW, and 210 degrees CW-30 degrees CCW) (P<.05). Both the continuous rotation and adaptive motion groups had significantly more dentinal cracks than the hand file group (P<.05). Regarding the different sections (3, 6, and 9 mm), there was a significant difference between the experimental groups at the 9-mm level (P<.05). Conclusions: The incidence of dentinal cracks is less with TF Adaptive instruments working in 210 degrees CW-30 degrees CCW reciprocating motion compared with working in continuous rotation and adaptive motion.