Akademik Veri Yönetim Sistemi
SYNESIS, cilt.14, sa.2, ss.105-118, 2022 (ESCI)
The purpuse of this study was to investigating tennis education in terms of two different training techniques for university students in turkey. Since both groups did not know tennis and the random sampling method was chosen, no preliminary tests were performed. The first group was given pieces of training using classical tennis teaching techniques. In the second group, the gamified mini tennis teaching method was used. 180 min 2 days a week. As a result, pieces of training were conducted. At the end of 10 weeks, the AOS Test results of the participants were taken and their evaluations were made with the SPSS 26.00 statistical package program. As a result, it was seen that the AOS test results of the first group (E1), the group that participated in the Classical training, were not statistically significant between the results of the second group (E2), the Gamified group. All results of the first (E1) group revealed significant differences in volley strokes. From this point of view, we can say that classical basic tennis training with adult groups is not a more effective method than gamified basic tennis training.